7 posts tagged “california”
The McFreeds share the following letter from Barack Obama with you...
Dear Friends,
Thank you for the opportunity to welcome everyone to the Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club's Pride Breakfast and to congratulate you on continuing a legacy of success, stretching back thirty-six years. As one of the oldest and most influential LGBT organizations in the country, you have continually rallied to support Democratic candidates and causes, and have fought tirelessly to secure equal rights and opportunities for LGBT Americans in California and throughout the country.
As the Democratic nominee for President, I am proud to join with and support the LGBT community in an effort to set our nation on a course that recognizes LGBT Americans with full equality under the law. That is why I support extending fully equal rights and benefits to same-sex couples under both state and federal law. That is why I support repealing the Defense of Marriage Act and the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy, and the passage of fully inclusive laws to protect LGBT Americans from hate crimes and employment discrimination. And that is why I oppose the divisive and discriminatory efforts to amend the California Constitution, and similar efforts to amend the U.S. Constitution or those of other states.
For too long, issues of LGBT rights have been exploited by those seeking to divide us. It's time to move beyond polarization and live up to our founding promise of equality by treating all our citizens with dignity and respect. This is no less than a core issue about who we are as Democrats and as Americans.
Finally, I want to congratulate all of you who have shown your love for each other by getting married these last few weeks. My thanks again to the Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club for allowing me to be a part of today's celebration. I look forward to working with you in the coming months and years, and I wish you all continued success.
Sincerely,
Barack Obama
The McFreeds share...

Del Martin, 87, and Phyllis Lyon, 83 have been together for 55 years... they finally got married yesterday. Here is a link to their story and role/place in GLBT history.
Congratulations!

Should it have really taken this long? Is their love any less than anyone else?

Sean opines...
Mrs Meaney (yes her real name) was conducting a vocabulary lesson that afternoon when I suddenly realized I was different from the other kids. Carter and Joe both turned around as Mrs. Meaney's back was turned to us and mouthed that hateful word to me. It was all without sound but I heard the hate and the truth loud and clear. "Faggot" they said and I never forgot it. I was so traumatized by what was said my mind collapsed and I entered a deep depression that frightened my parents. I believe that was the moment in time they knew who I was, but let me be to discover it myself. Carter and Joe were punished and confronted with their hate in the end. In their direct apology to me, they both expressed true feelings of forgiveness; saying they just couldn't comprehend how what they saw as harmless teasing affected me so deeply. Whatever their apology, the damage was done on my self-esteem. I felt worthless and alone at that moment and for a few weeks after. I supressed my feelings silently soon enough, turned on my Pollyanna grin, and moved on in life. However, fear and doubt organized in my subconscience and fueled my denial. Who wanted to be "different?" I soldiered on like a man should.
As high school and college came and went, a few moments stood out for me. Being the nerd I am I joined the "It's Academic" team and pursued my love of all things trivia. I met 3 friends, 2 juniors and a sophomore, who lived around the corner from and who I shared common interests and chemistry. For two years we were great friends and then we were not. I never understood why we stopped being friends. Maybe it was my age and the fact that they all went off to college way before me. Little did I know that was my first flirtation with love. Sure I had had crushes on girls in middle school, and pre-school had me screaming "I love Leslie" on many an audio tape in honor of a fellow 3 year-old classmate. But I found out later in life that someone truly had fallen in love with me and I never realized it until he told me years later. We tried to be friends later in life but we both were in troubled relationships and distance and fear of temptation caused us to drift apart. I think of him often and miss the friendship that we should have continued.
College found me so tightly wound I didn't know what to do. I found myself repulsed when I found out that one of the seniors I had come to know was gay. I limited my time with him and soon he graduated and life returned without curiousity. Unbeknownst to me, my sophomore college roommate Tim defended me to others when they asserted that I was gay and that he shouldn't move in with me. He covered for me while I just ignored who I was. I went on dating red heads and blondes now and again, all the while skimming the boundary of bisexual thoughts which we all know lead to gay town. But still I fought on and senior year had a short fling with another red head who strangely enough would supply a quote after she passed through my life that I would celebrate fondly. I regret those years sometimes. I was afraid. Think of all the life I could have lived without the stress of being found out. Building a confidence that I too could love and be loved without worrying about another group of boys turning around and calling me "faggot." I should have had those years back to better mold who I am rather than continuing another fight that lasted 3 more years.
After college I moved around and got into political organizing and student teaching. I heard the whispers about me but I "knew" I was straight. In 1995, I sat down at a dinner party with several friends and had the same experience that the "faggot" incident had hit me with years previously. A guest at the party, who was out and proud, looked me in the eye after I made a joke about a flirtation he made with another at the table and said "When are you going to stop running?" I shuddered and flashbacked, but this time I didn't fear. I took a journey in my mind and realized the real me was there. My college friends were the first to learn. "Amy was right," they said. The red headed freshman girl I had dated and "become a man" with had been quoted in an article about her becoming the 1st straight officer of a gay student organization: "All my boyfriends have ended up being gay." And she was right. I guess she was my Grace Adler but more forgettable.
Was I free though in my mind? I wasn't really. I kept my true self private and fled to Montana to learn about me without the distraction of parents and friends; preconceptions and truth was my fear. Montana was a time of total freedom that also had me looking forward to finding a special man in my life. I found someone through a mutual friend, returned back to my hometown, and tried to make a life together. That white knight story did not work out but I made a friend for life. My second try at love was more about trying to "complete me" and not "be me." I accept my blame for how things ended and try and make peace every day with myself and God about it. Love was a good goal but not at the expense of myself again. And then I searched my soul and my mind and my inner dark areas for the true me. After some cage shaking by friends and even chance strangers I realized who I was and now I am at peace. I even felt like I spoke to God to obtain forgiveness in my own heart for the self-loathing I victimized my self with. I had found the true me complete and forgiven! And that discovery, of course, all led me to the beauty that is Stefan...
Why do I write about all this? Why do I expose myself today? Because yesterday an institution in our great country said I was the "same" and my story must be told to show that Stefan and I are humans who deserve to love without political condition. Hiding is no longer an option; to reveal is the only answer. I have always felt different. I have always felt incomplete. I have always felt disappointed that things I thought I deserved in life were just out of reach because of who I am even though I kept my Pollyanna demeanor and soldiered on as the man I claim to be. Now, I feel I can be me and have hope that my strong heart and soul that Stefan celebrates every day as my partner may have a happy ending soon. My parents may never worry that I won't be left out of the great institution that is marriage. They know I will be safe and cared for after they leave this earth many years from now, potentially legally soon.
California confirmed to me and my gay and lesbian brothers and sisters that we are the "same". We will have to fight even harder to keep our affirmation given us by the California Supreme Court in a fight against a state constitutional amendment aimed at returning things back to the way they were. Regardless, the California Supreme Court's decision at this moment in declaring an end to true difference between gay and straight at least in one state is enormous! It makes me excited and proud to be me and have strengthened hope in the family Stefan and I are making. I can marry Stefan (which is planned for Fall 2009 at this point) just the same as anyone else now... even if opportunity is just open to us in one state at the moment. I have always loved the word "unique" but to be the "same" in this one instance is beyond words. Who knows we might just pre-empt Fall 2009 with a quick flight to the west coast soon!
The McFreeds jump up and down and shout about...
The California Supreme Court made it official today, both heterosexual and homosexual couples can now marry in the state of California... and call it marriage! In a 4-3 ruling, the court defined that marriage is not about tradition it is about creating one's own private relationship with someone else and having the state recognize and protect that union without prejudice. There is a state constitutional amendment pending a vote in November 2008 if it gets the right amount of signatures that could change this ruling. However, in 30 days two people (resident or non-resident) will be able to get married in California as long as they show up in person with a valid ID and the proof of any previous marriage's divorce (if applicable).
This is my favorite part of the ruling... which is 121 page long:
"...our state now recognizes that an individual’s capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual’s sexual orientation, and, more generally, that an individual’s sexual orientation — like a person’s race or gender — does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights. We therefore conclude that in view of the substance and significance of the fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship, the California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all Californians, whether gay or heterosexual, and to same-sex couples as well as to opposite-sex couples."
The McFreeds excitedly but nervously report...
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
NOTICE OF
FORTHCOMING FILING
The Supreme Court has indicated that the filing of a written opinion in the following case(s) is forthcoming. At the filing time designated below, the filed opinion(s) will be accessible at the judicial branch web site (www.courtinfo.ca.gov) and copies will be made available at the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office.
[Generally, the description set out with regard to each case is reproduced from the original news release issued when review in the matter was granted, and is provided for the convenience of the public and the press. The description does not necessarily reflect the view of the court, or define the specific issues that will be addressed by the court.]
IN RE MARRIAGE CASES
S147999 (A110449, A110450, A110451, A110463, A110651, A110652
San Francisco County JCCP – 4365)
Argued in San Francisco 3-04-08
This case includes the following issue: Does California’s statutory ban on marriage between two persons of the same sex violate the California Constitution by denying equal protection of the laws on the basis of sexual orientation or sex, by infringing on the fundamental right to marry, or by denying the right to privacy and freedom of expression?
Opinion(s) in the above case(s) will be filed on:
Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.
Sean and Stefan say...
This video of San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders (a Republican) found on Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish shows how personal contact really has an impact on how people view gays and lesbians in our community.
On Tuesday Sept 19, 2007, he agreed to sign a resolution passed by the San Diego City Council that directed the City Attorney's Office to file a brief in support of gay marriage. The council voted 5-3 to send the brief to the California State Supreme Court backing an end to the state's ban on same-sex marriage. Similar briefs have been sent by other cities, which like San Diego, are not directly involved in the case.
We saw this and thought this was a great example of a father's love (the mayor's daughter is a lesbian) taking precedence over politics. If only Vice President Dick Cheney expressed his this way.
Sean says...
I actually agree with this proposal...what do you all think? The electoral college should really be tied to the result of each district in terms of pluralism. Regardless of whether Democrats like it or not, this is truly the responsible way in determining our President and forcing competition in all areas of our country and not just a few districts. Maine I believe already does this. Point or counterpoint?
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/07/31/california-could-sway-2008-race/
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A Republican-backed ballot proposal could split left-leaning California between the Democratic and GOP nominees, tilting the 2008 presidential election in favor of the Republicans.
California awards its cache of 55 electoral votes to the statewide winner in presidential elections — the largest single prize in the nation. But a prominent Republican lawyer wants to put a proposal on the ballot that would award the statewide winner only two electoral votes.
The rest would be distributed to the winning candidate in each of the state’s congressional districts. In effect, that would create 53 races, each with one electoral vote up for grabs.
California has voted Democratic in the last four presidential elections. But the change — if it qualifies for one of two primary ballots next year and is approved by voters — would mean that a Republican would be positioned the following November to snatch 20 or more electoral votes in GOP-leaning districts.
That’s a number equal to winning Ohio.
The so-called Presidential Election Reform Act is being pushed by Thomas Hiltachk, a lawyer in a Sacramento firm that represents the California Republican Party and has worked with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. He did not return phone messages left Monday at his office.
A Schwarzenegger spokeswoman said the governor is not involved with the proposed initiative, and party officials said they have no connection to it.
Democratic consultant Chris Lehane called the plan “an effort to rig the system in order to fix the election.”
“If this change is made, it will virtually guarantee that a Republican wins the White House in 2008,” Lehane said in an e-mail.
Nineteen of the state’s 53 congressional districts are represented by Republicans. President Bush carried 22 districts in 2004, while losing the statewide vote by double digits.
Only Maine and Nebraska allocate electoral votes by congressional district.
A draft of the proposed initiative says nixing the winner-take-all system would give presidential candidates “an incentive to campaign in California. … Many of the geographic
areas of the state would be as important to a candidate’s chance for victory as many of the smaller states.”
“We’ll take a serious look at it, once it qualifies for the ballot,” state Republican Party Chairman Ron Nehring said.
If it does qualify, Democrats probably would have to spend millions of dollars to defeat it, which could drain money from other races. And there are expected to be additional ballot
proposals on abortion and other social issues that could drive up GOP turnout.
The state already moved its presidential primary to Feb. 5 in an attempt to increase its clout in national politics.
In that primary, Republicans will award delegates only to the top vote-getter in each congressional district. A Democrat can qualify for a delegate by winning at least 15 percent of the vote in a district.